Lessons in Demonstrating Return on Investment from State-Based Health Campaigns
Public health initiatives have traditionally been able to claim success by showing positive health impacts through program evaluations. However, as public health funding grows scarcer there is a growing expectation for evidence of economic impacts from funders.
States like Oklahoma and Tennessee, among others, have seen the need for and benefit of generating double impact evidence—health and economic—of their maternal and child health initiatives. However, conducing return on investment (ROI) analysis is not something all states have familiarity with or capabilities to do.
A new issue brief, co-authored by the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP) and NICHQ, shares lessons learned by Oklahoma and Tennessee on the process of performing an ROI analysis of a maternal and child health program. The issue brief is a result of a commitment to spread learnings from the NICHQ-led Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network to Reduce Infant Mortality (Infant Mortality CoIIN).
Performing an ROI analysis of a maternal and child health program requires multiple sources of data, such as vital statistics and hospital discharge records. In Oklahoma and Tennessee, multidisciplinary teams were engaged including state and hospital representatives as well as stakeholder groups, such as state perinatal quality collaboratives, and those trained in economic analyses.
In Tennessee, skill at economic analysis was an easily tapped resource through the University of Tennessee Health Science Center. The state has a long history of collaboration between state health stakeholders and academic health economists. In contrast, Oklahoma identified economics expertise using a competitive bid process. The issue brief provides details about the process for arriving at a final ROI answer for each state.
“While initiative leaders might assume that their efforts, in addition to improving health, save money, an ROI analysis lets leaders bring hard evidence to their state legislature or other funders, which helps to make the case for additional funding in the future,” says NICHQ Project Director Zhandra Levesque, MPH.
It is anticipated that ROI analyses may play an even greater role as the U.S. healthcare delivery system continues its transition to paying healthcare providers based on the quality of care rather than the quantity of care delivered.
One Step Closer to the National Norm of Infant Safe Sleep and Breastfeeding
Consistent, evidence-based advice on safe sleep and breastfeeding, whether in a hospital or at home, could improve maternal and infant health outcomes, save babies’ lives, and address significant racial disparities. Learn how a national initiative is seizing every opportunity to support caregivers and babies by working with hospitals and prenatal care centers, social service agencies, and other community touch points across the country.
Products that Cause Infant Deaths Should Be Recalled
In an effort to raise awareness, NICHQ urges our network to spread the word among the communities and families they work with about the potential danger of unsafe products. Read the full article here, which includes more voices from experts in the field.
Improving Healthcare Environments for Vulnerable Newborns
NICUs provide life-saving care for preterm babies. But, they can also expose babies to a high level of chemicals at an especially vulnerable period of life. Here, learn about a first-of-its-kind study on the long-term impact of environmental exposures in the NICU.
How States Can Better Support Community Early Childhood Efforts
Providing families with comprehensive services that actually fit their needs starts by elevating the work at the community level to inform policy and program improvements. New York’s approach to synergizing state and community work offers a valuable framework for other states to take up in their own systems-change efforts.
Heath Equity: What You Can Do
Because not everyone has equal opportunity to the resources needed for health and well-being, disparities are pervasive right from the earliest years of life. But where does an individual start? How does one person make a dent in a systemic and structural problem? Find three ideas here.