Countering Systems of Oppression
Reflections on Racial Responsibility in Systems Improvement Work
“I grew up in a predominantly white neighborhood,” says NICHQ Project Specialist, Avery Desrosiers, MPH. “As a result, I didn’t feel the color of my skin until I was almost 20 years old. I didn’t understand what my whiteness meant.”
Desrosiers spent several months in Cape Town, South Africa where she studied the strategies used during Apartheid to oppress Black South Africans systematically, and the lasting impact that had on communities. She recalls the stark contrast of mansions overlooking rundown housing projects while travelling along a highway that was constructed with the purpose of segregating communities.
“What I saw was disturbing but it felt removed from my own experiences,” says Desrosiers. “It wasn’t my country, my reality. So, in those moments, I was able to shrug off my racial responsibility.”
Later during a homestay, Desrosiers’ South African host tried to have a conversation with her about race. It wasn’t until this moment that Desrosiers began to realize that being white had affected all her actions and experiences. That oppressive systems existed in many places including where she grew up—she simply didn’t know she had a role in them.
“I don’t even really remember the conversation because I just felt so ashamed and guilty,” she says. “I did not want to admit my own blind spots and felt so ashamed that I had exempted myself from thinking critically about all the ways that racist systems had benefitted me. My reaction was a defense mechanism because I was being confronted with a reality that seemed to challenge my own self-image of being a good person, unaffected by racism.”
What Desrosiers experienced is a common stress response that can be triggered when we feel threatened or uncomfortable in conversations. However, these conversations, particularly reflective ones about our own conscious and unconscious contributions to maintaining systemic racism, are necessary in all initiatives and programs seeking to tackle health equity. Without these conversations, we (children’s health advocates and stakeholders) can’t acknowledge and address the structural inequities affecting the heath of families across the country.
Acknowledging structural inequities
Black women and women of color experience significantly higher rates of morbidity than white women. Black maternal mortality rates are four times higher than that of white women. And only 7.5 percent of physicians identify as African American and they are more likely to work in underserved communities.
These inequities, explains Global Infant Safe Sleep Center Founder Stacy Scott, PhD, MPA, result from multiple levels of racism—institutional racism that influences laws and policies, personally mediated racism that influences care and treatment, and internalized racism that changes the way communities of color see themselves.
“Together, this racism affects our systems and communities,” says Scott. “And critically, it affects health programs; it influences how we go about providing services to the populations we are all committed to serving.”
Solutions start by acknowledging racism, acknowledging how one has participated or been the target of systematic oppression, and having critical conversations about the influence of race and oppression on health systems and programs. But, as Desrosiers’ experience exemplifies, having these conversations is far from easy.
“It should be exhausting to be a white person because it is exhausting to be a person of color in this country,” says Desrosiers. “It takes intentional work, reflection, and dedicated resources to target the internalized, interpersonal, and structural ways that prejudice and implicit bias inform our interactions, programs and policies.”
Engaging in conversations about race
It can be tempting for health professionals to gravitate toward a colorblind approach, Desrosiers explains. The attitude 'I don’t see color' sounds equitable. But it mistakes uniformity for equity, disregards differences that should inform treatment and care (such as cultural values or historic trauma), and, critically, it exempts people from participating in conversations about race.
“Supporting equitable health has been a big part of my academic and professional interests, which makes it hard to think of myself as engaging in racism, even unconsciously,” says Desrosiers. “But we all experience implicit bias and we all participate in stereotyping. If we’re always stuck trying to prove we aren’t, we excuse ourselves from the conversations and never unpack what’s informing our perceptions. This keeps us from moving forward and changing our systems.”
Still, unpacking perceptions takes more than acknowledging they exist. It also means preparing for the stress response that conversations about race will trigger—the stress response Desrosiers experienced in South Africa when she was still in college.
“People, especially white people, are socialized to get stressed out when talking about race,” says Desrosiers. “And our biological response to stress might be to cry, shut down, and go silent. This is what happened to me. This is why we need to prepare for those responses, learning to lean into our discomfort. The more we analyze our stress response, the more capable we become of unlearning that behavior. In doing this, we can begin to focus that energy on human connection, understanding what about our internal dialogue caused initial discomfort, and really pursue systems-change.”
How can we do this in a quality improvement project?
Acknowledging inequities, considering how we participate in those inequities, and not shying away from uncomfortable conversations—these are all critical actions for health improvement stakeholders. But what does this look like in a health improvement project?
Below, Desrosiers and Scott have identified six critical questions health improvement participants can bring to each initiative to ensure they’re advancing equity together. They recommend applying each question to each change, policy or practice that initiatives seek to improve.
- Have you named the root causes of the inequity at play? If you cannot name it, you cannot measure it, target it or dismantle it.
- What would be different if you centered on the experiences of people of color instead of conducting business as usual?
- What would it look like if power in decision making, planning, implementation and evaluation was distributed equitably?
- Are you collecting data that is stratified by race and ethnicity as you implement your policy or practice?
- How will you assess whether any groups are unintentionally impacted in a negative way by the policy or practice?
- What are some key ways that the policy or practice will be sustained, and continued by the members of the community?
Critically engaging with these questions will not be easy, both Scott and Desrosiers caution. It will require recognizing our implicit biases, understanding where individual experiences may come at the expense of other people, and grappling with the discomfort they’ve described. But if we can do this, if we can answer these questions honestly and with intention, we can begin to lay the groundwork for change.
Building an Early Childhood Community Coalition
A coalition of diverse stakeholders has proven to be a catalyst for early childhood improvement in Chelsea, Massachusetts, helping them align messages, raise awareness, and collect more robust and relevant data. Ready build one in your community? Find out how here.
A Call to Keep More Moms and Babies Safe
Preeclampsia, a dangerous disorder where a mother’s blood pressure spikes during pregnancy, is one of the leading causes of maternal and infant illness and death. Here, a mother who lost her baby daughter shares a plea for improvement.
Millions of Invisible Children
Over 13 million children live in rural areas and of those 13 million, more than a quarter live in poverty. Here, NICHQ Chief Health Officer Elizabeth Coté, MD, MPH, expands on the urgent need to understand and respond to the disparities in health outcomes for this population of children.
Bringing Breastfeeding Support to More Mothers and Caregivers
In an increasingly digital age, telelactation support is a powerful opportunity to increase breastfeeding rates among amothers who can't access classes. In addition to over the phone, lactation consultants and counselors can support moms through video chats like Skype, via text message or in online communities.
A Mother-Centered Approach to Treating Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
A mother-centered approach to caring for NAS may reduce the need for drug treatment and length of hospital stays. Here, Matthew Grossman, MD, one of the authors of the approach, expands on its benefits for improving infant health outcomes.
A Better Approach to Conversations about Breastfeeding
Without hearing directly from mothers, health professionals can’t provide meaningful education and support that speaks to each mother’s individual views and experiences. This is one reason why improving conversations with breastfeeding mothers can help increase breastfeeding rates. Here, two experts offer advice on how put a better conversational approach into action.