What Comes First? The Policy or the Change?
Policy can be an important driver of change. However, in our efforts to leverage change through updating or introducing new policies, we often experience a long and arduous process as we vet the evidence, consider the impact of change, write the policy and move it through our systems to final approval. What happens if this process impedes or delays the provision of higher quality, evidence-based care, such as new infant safety recommendations or a proposal for improved epilepsy diagnosis? In other words, what happens if policy becomes a barrier to change rather than a core driver?
Developing a policy change requires buy-in from many stakeholders, all at various levels with different responsibilities and fluctuating priorities. Because of this, creating and implementing policy can be challenging and can often take months or years to finalize. However, quality improvement doesn’t have to wait for policy. There are important changes that not only can, but should be made while awaiting a standardized policy.
As quality improvement advisor Sue Butts-Dion explains, “Having a policy is an important way to standardize practice and can drive some change just by existing. However, testing changes to improve the system doesn’t need to begin with or wait for a policy. In fact, when people have the chance to test out pieces of the plan before it becomes a permanent policy, there is a higher likelihood that people will buy-in to the final product. In the improvement world, some call this ‘learning our way to implementation’ or, in this case, learning our way to the new policy.”
When we do this, we capitalize on a strategy that is:
- Agile: Once a policy is set in place, it can be difficult to reverse or adjust. By testing change strategies first, we can adapt and customize to different circumstances, settings or unforeseen barriers so that the final policy is translatable, relevant and comprehensive.
- Data driven: Testing first ensures a road tested final policy. Proof of success drives positive change and encourages buy-in from more participants.
- Proactive: Once we have evidence, we can begin to test a practice, measure change and build towards a formal protocol. We can drive change before the policy is in place.
Despite the importance of learning our way to a policy, organizations are very policy-based and are hesitant to make change before a policy is in place. “In a recent project, participant perspectives revealed that most believed change relied on putting a policy in place first,” says Butts-Dion. “While policy does contribute to change, I think we can do a better job of explaining why testing matters and outlining what steps to take before a policy exists.”
To address this discrepancy, NICHQ Senior Director Jennifer Ustianov, MS, BSN, RN, IBCLC, identified several essential tips for initiating a culture of change before the policy is in place.
First is to recognize that a policy-based environment can feel forced; instead we need to develop a culture that anticipates and welcomes change by creating a learning environment where evidence-based care is translated, through implementation testing, to optimal care. “When we identify and prioritize evidence-based strategies, we support a learning environment that always seeks the very best care. In response, evidence, rather than rules, drives policy,” says Ustianov.
Support this strategy by finding your champions. These are the stakeholders who believe in evidence-based practice and want to improve outcomes by testing change. Each champion will share results and progress with his or her own network of peers, encouraging an environment of continuous learning and improvement.
Finally, advises Ustianov, change efforts need to prioritize quality improvement (QI) science. QI methods, like PDSA cycles, validate the process of testing change on a small scale, offer an opportunity for staff and patient input and encourage buy-in, all while providing concrete steps for applying the strategy to a broader group or population.
Together, these tactics can help create a culture of change where policy is an outcome of shared learning and proven testing. And importantly, this culture ensures that you remain open and flexible once a policy is in place, allowing for continued refinement and improvement as new evidence becomes available.
Interested in finding out more about QI methods? Take our course, Quality Improvement 101 to get started!
Creating a Structure for Improvement in Complex Health Systems
Positively intervening in early childhood development means creating a system that supports the people at all levels, from those working in healthcare and social services settings, to daycare and community support networks, to those in the child’s home. These three essential strategies can help develop such a system, close the gap between research and practice, and take positive steps toward change.
What’s Next for Sickle Cell Disease Improvement? Three Areas That Still Need Our Attention
Right now, close to 100,000 people in the U.S. are battling sickle cell disease (SCD). This means that 100,000 people, many of whom are children, spend days experiencing acute pain, dealing with costly and uncomfortable hospitalizations, and fighting off infections. We can change that. Here are three key areas for targeted improvement.
The Most Insightful Stories of 2017
With 2017 drawing to a close, we’re taking stock of some of our hits and highlights. From change management advice to project results and takeaways, here’s a rundown of the website stories you found most engaging over the past year.
9 Tips for Moving from One PDSA Cycle to the Next
After finishing your first PDSA cycle, you're ready to dive into the next phase of continuous improvement: your second, third and fourth PDSA cycle, or, as many cycles as needed to reach the final adoption stage. Here are nine rules to help you double check and develop your next round of predictions.
Closing the Breastfeeding Disparity Gap: Methods for Improvement
When compared to all other racial groups, Hispanic mothers are most likely to supplement breastmilk with formula within the first two days of life. One hospital on the Texas-Mexico border, serving a nearly 100 percent Hispanic population, has introduced a variety of interventions aimed at closing the breastfeeding disparity gap, specifically as it relates to exclusive breastfeeding.
A Proactive Approach to Early Children’s Vision Screening
As part of the Improving Children’s Vision: Systems, Stakeholders & Support (ICV) initiative, NICHQ is helping three states to develop comprehensive, coordinated approaches to improving vision and eye health for children under age 5. Introducing a systems-level approach can best overcome geographic and economic obstacles, and navigate the various components of state and community health systems.