What Comes First? The Policy or the Change?
Policy can be an important driver of change. However, in our efforts to leverage change through updating or introducing new policies, we often experience a long and arduous process as we vet the evidence, consider the impact of change, write the policy and move it through our systems to final approval. What happens if this process impedes or delays the provision of higher quality, evidence-based care, such as new infant safety recommendations or a proposal for improved epilepsy diagnosis? In other words, what happens if policy becomes a barrier to change rather than a core driver?
Developing a policy change requires buy-in from many stakeholders, all at various levels with different responsibilities and fluctuating priorities. Because of this, creating and implementing policy can be challenging and can often take months or years to finalize. However, quality improvement doesn’t have to wait for policy. There are important changes that not only can, but should be made while awaiting a standardized policy.
As quality improvement advisor Sue Butts-Dion explains, “Having a policy is an important way to standardize practice and can drive some change just by existing. However, testing changes to improve the system doesn’t need to begin with or wait for a policy. In fact, when people have the chance to test out pieces of the plan before it becomes a permanent policy, there is a higher likelihood that people will buy-in to the final product. In the improvement world, some call this ‘learning our way to implementation’ or, in this case, learning our way to the new policy.”
When we do this, we capitalize on a strategy that is:
- Agile: Once a policy is set in place, it can be difficult to reverse or adjust. By testing change strategies first, we can adapt and customize to different circumstances, settings or unforeseen barriers so that the final policy is translatable, relevant and comprehensive.
- Data driven: Testing first ensures a road tested final policy. Proof of success drives positive change and encourages buy-in from more participants.
- Proactive: Once we have evidence, we can begin to test a practice, measure change and build towards a formal protocol. We can drive change before the policy is in place.
Despite the importance of learning our way to a policy, organizations are very policy-based and are hesitant to make change before a policy is in place. “In a recent project, participant perspectives revealed that most believed change relied on putting a policy in place first,” says Butts-Dion. “While policy does contribute to change, I think we can do a better job of explaining why testing matters and outlining what steps to take before a policy exists.”
To address this discrepancy, NICHQ Senior Director Jennifer Ustianov, MS, BSN, RN, IBCLC, identified several essential tips for initiating a culture of change before the policy is in place.
First is to recognize that a policy-based environment can feel forced; instead we need to develop a culture that anticipates and welcomes change by creating a learning environment where evidence-based care is translated, through implementation testing, to optimal care. “When we identify and prioritize evidence-based strategies, we support a learning environment that always seeks the very best care. In response, evidence, rather than rules, drives policy,” says Ustianov.
Support this strategy by finding your champions. These are the stakeholders who believe in evidence-based practice and want to improve outcomes by testing change. Each champion will share results and progress with his or her own network of peers, encouraging an environment of continuous learning and improvement.
Finally, advises Ustianov, change efforts need to prioritize quality improvement (QI) science. QI methods, like PDSA cycles, validate the process of testing change on a small scale, offer an opportunity for staff and patient input and encourage buy-in, all while providing concrete steps for applying the strategy to a broader group or population.
Together, these tactics can help create a culture of change where policy is an outcome of shared learning and proven testing. And importantly, this culture ensures that you remain open and flexible once a policy is in place, allowing for continued refinement and improvement as new evidence becomes available.
Interested in finding out more about QI methods? Take our course, Quality Improvement 101 to get started!
From 50th in the Nation to a National Success. Delaware Improves Early Childhood Outcomes
Right now, more than 15 percent of children miss out on early developmental screenings and risk their future health. Find out what Delaware is doing to prioritize screenings and make sure Delaware children start school healthy and prepared.
NICHQ’s New Clinical Director of Early Childhood Initiatives Has a Plan for Improvement
As NICHQ’s new Clinical Director of Early Childhood Initiatives, Jill Sells, MD, FAAP, is invested in improving early childhood systems on a national scale. Keep reading to find out more about her goals and learn what gets her up in the morning ready to drive change in early childhood systems.
Improving Children’s Vision in Your State: Three Teams Share Lessons Learned
Early childhood eye care can drastically change a child’s health and well-being. For the past two years, improvement teams in Arizona, Ohio and Wyoming have been working to increase screenings and identify measures that can be spread to other states and communities. Here are some of their key lessons-learned.
What 2018 Means for Children’s Health
We recently sat down with NICHQ President and CEO Scott D. Berns, MD, MPH, FAAP, who shared his thoughts on building on 2017’s successes, the biggest opportunities in 2018 and how NICHQ can drive change in children’s health outcomes. Check out a short video and then read on to uncover what Berns is prioritizing in 2018.
Creating a Structure for Improvement in Complex Systems
Positively intervening in early childhood development means creating a system that supports the people at all levels, from those working in healthcare and social services settings, to daycare and community support networks, to those in the child’s home. These three essential strategies can help develop such a system, close the gap between research and practice, and take positive steps toward change.
What’s Next for Sickle Cell Disease Improvement? Three Areas That Still Need Our Attention
Right now, close to 100,000 people in the U.S. are battling sickle cell disease (SCD). This means that 100,000 people, many of whom are children, spend days experiencing acute pain, dealing with costly and uncomfortable hospitalizations, and fighting off infections. We can change that. Here are three key areas for targeted improvement.