What Comes First? The Policy or the Change?
Updating or introducing new policies can be an important driver of change. However, we often experience a long and arduous process as we vet the evidence, consider the impact of change, write the policy and move it through our systems to final approval. Before we're done, we need to confirm buy-in from many stakeholders, all at various levels with different responsibilities and fluctuating priorities. Because of this, creating and implementing policy can be challenging and can often take months or years to finalize.
And what happens if this process impedes or delays the provision of higher quality, evidence-based care, such as new infant safety recommendations or a proposal for improved epilepsy diagnosis? In other words, what happens if policy becomes a barrier to change rather than a core driver?
Quality improvement doesn’t have to wait for policy. There are important changes that not only can, but should be made while awaiting a standardized policy.
As NICHQ Quality Improvement Advisor Sue Butts-Dion explains, “Having a policy is an important way to standardize practice and can drive some change just by existing. However, testing changes to improve the system doesn’t need to begin with or wait for a policy. In fact, when people have the chance to test out pieces of the plan before it becomes a permanent policy, there is a higher likelihood that people will buy-in to the final product. In the improvement world, some call this ‘learning our way to implementation’ or, in this case, learning our way to the new policy.”
When we do this, we capitalize on a strategy that is:
- Agile: Once a policy is set in place, it can be difficult to reverse or adjust. By testing change strategies first, we can adapt and customize to different circumstances, settings or unforeseen barriers so that the final policy is translatable, relevant and comprehensive.
- Data driven: Testing first ensures a road tested final policy. Proof of success drives positive change and encourages buy-in from more participants.
- Proactive: Once we have evidence, we can begin to test a practice, measure change and build towards a formal protocol. We can drive change before the policy is in place.
Despite the importance of learning our way to a policy, organizations are very policy-based and are hesitant to make change before a policy is in place. “In a recent project, participant perspectives revealed that most believed change relied on putting a policy in place first,” says Butts-Dion. “While policy does contribute to change, I think we can do a better job of explaining why testing matters and outlining what steps to take before a policy exists.”
To address this discrepancy, NICHQ Senior Director Jennifer Ustianov, MS, BSN, RN, IBCLC, identified several essential tips for initiating a culture of change before the policy is in place.
First is to recognize that a policy-based environment can feel forced; instead we need to develop a culture that anticipates and welcomes change by creating a learning environment where evidence-based care is translated, through implementation testing, to optimal care. “When we identify and prioritize evidence-based strategies, we support a learning environment that always seeks the very best care. In response, evidence, rather than rules, drives policy,” says Ustianov.
Support this strategy by finding your champions. These are the stakeholders who believe in evidence-based practice and want to improve outcomes by testing change. Each champion will share results and progress with his or her own network of peers, encouraging an environment of continuous learning and improvement.
Finally, advises Ustianov, change efforts need to prioritize quality improvement (QI) science. QI methods, like PDSA cycles, validate the process of testing change on a small scale, offer an opportunity for staff and patient input and encourage buy-in, all while providing concrete steps for applying the strategy to a broader group or population.
Together, these tactics can help create a culture of change where policy is an outcome of shared learning and proven testing. And importantly, this culture ensures that you remain open and flexible once a policy is in place, allowing for continued refinement and improvement as new evidence becomes available.
Interested in finding out more about QI methods? Take our course, Quality Improvement 101 to get started!
Social-Emotional Health is Often Invisible, But Needs Support Too
Here, NICHQ Project Director Colleen Murphy, MSMOB, shares how a classroom shooting changed her daughter's life and inspired Murphy to improve children's health systems.
Getting My Son the Support He Needed Shouldn’t Have Been this Hard
When NICHQ's Senior Director of Programs thought her son might have a disability, she realized that health systems can leave mothers feeling powerless to help their children. It's one of the reasons she's so committed to their improvement.
Helping Health Plans Improve Asthma Outcomes
Asthma currently affects over six million children across the U.S., making it one of the most widespread chronic childhood diseases. And while successful treatments exist, too many children still end up in the emergency room fighting to breathe. Working with health plans can change those numbers by ensuring that preventative treatments and services help more children. Here's how one state is engaging health plans to improve asthma outcomes.
Starting School Prepared Should Be a Right, Not a Privilege
In theory, everyone should start school on equal footing. But the reality is very different for many children across the country. Even before birth, social determinants of health such as parental income and maternal education affect a child's developmental health. Changing this means building stronger systems that support and empower families so all children can achieve kindergarten readiness.
Our Systems Meant to Help Are Hurting Black Families
When does mandated reporting hurt rather than improve health outcomes? Erin Cloud, who’s spent the past seven years advocating for parents in the child welfare system, shares a thought provoking story about what happens when biased reporting causes unintentional harm. Here, we shine a spotlight on this troubling example of when systems meant to support children’s health end up failing black mothers and children.
How Do We Address Safe Sleep Disparities? Start by Building Trust
Healthy babies shouldn’t die in their sleep. But, despite decades of trying to reduce the number of sudden unexpected infant deaths (SUID) they still persist. And most often, their persistence affects families of color. In this article, Founder of the Global Infant Safe Sleep Center, Stacy Scott, shares ideas on how we can best address this alarming lack of equity and reduce sleep-related deaths across all populations.