Using Simulation Modeling Technology to Make a Case for Change
Imagine you had multiple best practices for reducing cesarean sections (c-section) rates in your state but wanted to know which would have the most impact and all you had to do was push a few buttons to find out. That is exactly what a simulation model is doing in the state of New Jersey.
Simulation modeling is a way to analyze data and its impact in virtual scenarios. “When you’re building a simulation model, you build a virtual world to better understand what would happen in the real world before you make changes,” says model designer and builder Seri Anderson, MPH, research assistant for the National Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Workforce Development Center.
Reducing the number of preterm and early term births is one of New Jersey’s focus areas as part of the NICHQ-led Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network to Reduce Infant Mortality (Infant Mortality CoIIN). The state Title V program is partnering with the National MCH Workforce Development Center to decrease the number of non-medically indicated early elective deliveries (<39 weeks).
Although c-sections are one of the most common procedures in the United States, complications for mom and baby exist at a higher rate than with vaginal births. For a first time mom, having a vaginal birth also minimizes potential problems for future pregnancies and decreases the rate of additional c-sections, since not all physicians are comfortable with a woman laboring after a cesarean. In addition, each subsequent c-section increases the rate of long term complications, such as damage to blood vessels, surrounding organs and uterine rupture. As a whole, outcomes for mom and baby after a vaginal delivery are better than for mothers who deliver via c-section.
The Federal Department of Health and Human Services set a goal to reduce the number of c-sections for low-risk pregnancies (defined as first time moms with a single baby who is head down, at or over 37 weeks of pregnancy) to 23.9 percent by 2020. In 2013, the c-section rate for low-risk pregnancies was 26.9 percent.
But c-section rates vary from state to state and even hospital to hospital within a single state, showing a need for data-driven decision making and implementation of best practices most likely to lead to a vaginal birth. In 2013, New Jersey had a low-risk c-section rate of 33.1 percent and saw a reduction the following year of 1.2 percent. Committed to continue lowering their rate, New Jersey will use the simulation model to engage stakeholders to create state-wide change.
As a first step to building the model, the National MCH Workforce Development Center did extensive literature reviews for evidence-based interventions that had a quantifiable impact leading to vaginal births. The model itself is built in a computer program combining existing evidence, expert experience and has the critical feature of predicting impact. The model can estimate how many c-sections could be prevented, based on the scale of the implemented changes.
The team in New Jersey held a large stakeholder meeting in late August to present the hands-on simulation model. “With the model, we are saying, ‘Here is what you can do’ and helping stakeholders visualize the collective impact,” says Amanda Cornett, MPH, coach to the National MCH Workforce Development Center's New Jersey team.
At NICHQ, we teach people to use evidence-based strategies and to test on a small scale before implementing policy changes. “Simulation is another great tool to apply to improvement work. Seeing the impact lets you know which evidence-base strategy to target first,” says NICHQ Executive Project Director Pat Heinrich.
Based on this August meeting, the New Jersey team will come together again to prioritize which evidence-based strategies are best for New Jersey to lower their rate of low-risk c-sections. From there the group will transition into creating a plan to disseminate the recommendations and provide support at the state level for implementation.
Opportunities to Improve Health Equity for Mothers, Babies and Children
To understand health holistically, we need to consider it outside the silo of a healthcare system. We need to take into account the many other factors that impact our individual health, factors like the schools we attend and the relationships we experience. Read on to uncover three tried and tested ways to make changes in your state and help ensure that all children, regardless of circumstance, achieve equity in health outcomes.
Creating a Structure for Improvement in Complex Health Systems
Positively intervening in early childhood development means creating a system that supports the people at all levels, from those working in healthcare and social services settings, to daycare and community support networks, to those in the child’s home. These three essential strategies can help develop such a system, close the gap between research and practice, and take positive steps toward change.
What’s Next for Sickle Cell Disease Improvement? Three Areas That Still Need Our Attention
Right now, close to 100,000 people in the U.S. are battling sickle cell disease (SCD). This means that 100,000 people, many of whom are children, spend days experiencing acute pain, dealing with costly and uncomfortable hospitalizations, and fighting off infections. We can change that. Here are three key areas for targeted improvement.
The Most Insightful Stories of 2017
With 2017 drawing to a close, we’re taking stock of some of our hits and highlights. From change management advice to project results and takeaways, here’s a rundown of the website stories you found most engaging over the past year.
9 Tips for Moving from One PDSA Cycle to the Next
After finishing your first PDSA cycle, you're ready to dive into the next phase of continuous improvement: your second, third and fourth PDSA cycle, or, as many cycles as needed to reach the final adoption stage. Here are nine rules to help you double check and develop your next round of predictions.
Closing the Breastfeeding Disparity Gap: Methods for Improvement
When compared to all other racial groups, Hispanic mothers are most likely to supplement breastmilk with formula within the first two days of life. One hospital on the Texas-Mexico border, serving a nearly 100 percent Hispanic population, has introduced a variety of interventions aimed at closing the breastfeeding disparity gap, specifically as it relates to exclusive breastfeeding.