Using Simulation Modeling Technology to Make a Case for Change
Imagine you had multiple best practices for reducing cesarean sections (c-section) rates in your state but wanted to know which would have the most impact and all you had to do was push a few buttons to find out. That is exactly what a simulation model is doing in the state of New Jersey.
Simulation modeling is a way to analyze data and its impact in virtual scenarios. “When you’re building a simulation model, you build a virtual world to better understand what would happen in the real world before you make changes,” says model designer and builder Seri Anderson, MPH, research assistant for the National Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Workforce Development Center.
Reducing the number of preterm and early term births is one of New Jersey’s focus areas as part of the NICHQ-led Collaborative Improvement and Innovation Network to Reduce Infant Mortality (Infant Mortality CoIIN). The state Title V program is partnering with the National MCH Workforce Development Center to decrease the number of non-medically indicated early elective deliveries (<39 weeks).
Although c-sections are one of the most common procedures in the United States, complications for mom and baby exist at a higher rate than with vaginal births. For a first time mom, having a vaginal birth also minimizes potential problems for future pregnancies and decreases the rate of additional c-sections, since not all physicians are comfortable with a woman laboring after a cesarean. In addition, each subsequent c-section increases the rate of long term complications, such as damage to blood vessels, surrounding organs and uterine rupture. As a whole, outcomes for mom and baby after a vaginal delivery are better than for mothers who deliver via c-section.
The Federal Department of Health and Human Services set a goal to reduce the number of c-sections for low-risk pregnancies (defined as first time moms with a single baby who is head down, at or over 37 weeks of pregnancy) to 23.9 percent by 2020. In 2013, the c-section rate for low-risk pregnancies was 26.9 percent.
But c-section rates vary from state to state and even hospital to hospital within a single state, showing a need for data-driven decision making and implementation of best practices most likely to lead to a vaginal birth. In 2013, New Jersey had a low-risk c-section rate of 33.1 percent and saw a reduction the following year of 1.2 percent. Committed to continue lowering their rate, New Jersey will use the simulation model to engage stakeholders to create state-wide change.
As a first step to building the model, the National MCH Workforce Development Center did extensive literature reviews for evidence-based interventions that had a quantifiable impact leading to vaginal births. The model itself is built in a computer program combining existing evidence, expert experience and has the critical feature of predicting impact. The model can estimate how many c-sections could be prevented, based on the scale of the implemented changes.
The team in New Jersey held a large stakeholder meeting in late August to present the hands-on simulation model. “With the model, we are saying, ‘Here is what you can do’ and helping stakeholders visualize the collective impact,” says Amanda Cornett, MPH, coach to the National MCH Workforce Development Center's New Jersey team.
At NICHQ, we teach people to use evidence-based strategies and to test on a small scale before implementing policy changes. “Simulation is another great tool to apply to improvement work. Seeing the impact lets you know which evidence-base strategy to target first,” says NICHQ Executive Project Director Pat Heinrich.
Based on this August meeting, the New Jersey team will come together again to prioritize which evidence-based strategies are best for New Jersey to lower their rate of low-risk c-sections. From there the group will transition into creating a plan to disseminate the recommendations and provide support at the state level for implementation.
Make Perinatal Regionalization Work for Your State
Perinatal regionalization can improve health outcomes for mothers and babies, creating a stronger system of care. But communication and process barriers can get in the way. Here, Dr. Christopher Glantz, MD, MPH, provides strategies for developing a regionalization system that empowers affiliate hospitals as true partners in collaboration.
Launch an Early Childhood Parent Academy
Interested in developing free, accessible lessons that empower parents around early childhood development? An early childhood parent academy—a structured set of courses covering key topic areas that parents need to know about early childhood development—does just that. Click in for a curriculum and strategies on how to launch one in your state.
Conversations Can Stop Sleep-Related Infant Deaths
To help reduce sleep-related infant deaths, Founder of the Global Infant Safe Sleep Center, Stacy Scott, PhD, MPA and a team of experts compiled a list of tactics and examples to support infant safe sleep conversations. Each strategy responds to a real-life example from health professionals across the country.
Keeping Families Together Improves Children’s Health Outcomes, from Borders to Communities
Thousands of children were recently separated from their families on the Texas border. Too many children have undergone the trauma of preventable family separation, which cannot be undone. NICHQ's new Chief Health Officer, Elizabeth Coté, MD, MPA, has witnessed the devastating effects of caregiver-child separation in communities across the country and across the world. In this article, she speaks up about the harm of that separation and urges us to remain vigilant about keeping families together.
Case Study: Engagement of Title V, Healthy Start and Families to Increase New Mother Wellness in NJ
A new issue brief, co-authored by AMCHP and NICHQ, explores how New Jersey engaged mothers in its efforts to improve postpartum visit rates as a strategy to increase new mother wellness.
Lessons in Demonstrating Return on Investment from State-Based Health Campaigns
States have seen the need for and benefit of generating double impact evidence—health and economic—of their maternal and child health initiatives. However, conducing return on investment (ROI) analysis is not something all states have familiarity with or capabilities to do. A new issue brief shares lessons learned by Oklahoma and Tennessee on the process of performing an ROI analysis of a maternal and child health program.